Skip to main content

You delegated the task. How likely are you to get satisfied with outcomes?

In a typical task/role/responsibility delegation, you share your tasks but do not want to lose ownership. You just grant permission, allow certain access, convey to delegatee, how dear or important is the task to you and hope the delegatee will take up and complete the task as you wanted.
Not a wrong expectation. All of us do this.
What can ensure your success in a delegated environment are certain intangibles of relationship and understanding between the delegator and the delegatee, other than administrative aspects as mentioned in the above paragraph.
Here we are talking about the downward delegation as I want the importance of the task not just remain administrative in sense of responsibility transfer as would normally happen in cases of cross delegation.
Between the two human beings, the delegator and delegatee, the delegator has a larger responsibility at the moment of task transfer. She is in the hot seat , who has to ensure, the delegation has to work!
The four (4) stages in the act of delegation are as given below- (CLICK ON THE PICTURE FOR BETTER VIEW)







1.Understanding transfer
2.Retention settlement
3.Focus balance, and
4.Delivery
Here, we are talking about ensuring success of delegation and not just delegation and the knowledge transfer process.
The truth of the moment is that, many a times you don't have control over the selection of delegatee. Knowing this, you always have to ensure that transferring the understanding is your first level of challenge.
At the understanding stage, both delegator and delegatee have to be in active stage. The delegator has to establish the fact that delegation is a bi-partite agreement and it would require serious interest and attention from the delegatee. Certain ground rules of absolute attention to facts and details will help ensure, understanding. While delegator maintains active state of building understanding of for tasks, she has to keep confirming, if the understanding is getting acknowledged with the delegatee by asking confirming questions. At this first stage, both the parties have to be in very active stage and remain focused. Loss of attention can be detrimental. That is the risk.

The second stage is Retention. This stage is highly dependent on the capacity of the delegatee to keep the understanding with them. This capacity to retain the knowledge and skills transferred is highly dependent on the kind of professional the delegatee is. We all know about A, B and C players.

The third stage, Focus is again very much the territory of the deleagtee as it is state of motivation, capacity to remain focused, perseverance, capacity to collaborate, network, make it happen. Here a supervisor can ensure constant touch-base with delegatee, help keep motivation level high and focus intact.
This is the stage which ensures quality of delivery to a larger extent. Here delegator's role becomes important as she would know where can she expect the motivation level to dip, understanding the level of task assigned and complexity or detail orientation involved in the task.
It is always advisable for a delegator to keep tab on development stages in the task accomplishments and keep confirming that things are running smooth. Provide help and direction when and where needed.

Delivery is the final stage which is ownership of not only delegatee but delegator as well.
Remember as a delegator, we always try to keep control with us. Accountability remains with the delegator as primarily, the task was owned by the delegator.
This model can be named 'UR-FD model' as abbreviated term that can be coined out of the four words, Understanding, Retention, Focus and Delivery (UR-FD).
The separation here between UR and FD is intentional as they are two set of stages in delegation, While UR is pre-action stage FD is action stage.

Comments

  1. Very good blog. Core of delegation process well explained. Very helpful

    Swapnil Deshmukh

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is The Hay Group Total Reward Framework

The Hay Group Total Reward Framework A new way of understanding reward Reward strategies must be anchored in business reality to be effective. Which means linking it to your business strategy – and the needs of your employees as well as your organisation. Our Total Reward Framework helps you optimise reward, no matter how challenging the conditions. The issue Remuneration tends to be one of the worst-managed parts of an organisation’s cost structure. But with 10-70 per cent of total costs wrapped up in it, reward cannot be ignored, particularly in a downturn. To be effective, reward programmes must reflect the needs of the business, now and in the future. Only if they are tied closely to company strategy, business performance and the needs of employees can reward programmes deliver the ROI that is needed in tough times[MK1] . The Hay Group Total Reward Framework takes strategy as a starting point – and it focuses on total reward: every financial measure together with no

Aon Hewitt Total Rewards Framework

Aon Hewitt Total Rewards Framework The Aon Hewitt model and approach believes in considering Total Rewards as a business tool and very much linked to overall business objectives! Reward as understood is a very complex mechanism and some efforts of correcting the base pay and titling in a hurry by many MNCs in India have done a bigger crime by trying to correct it by market adjustments without looking at the talent map, complexity and expectations out of role and mapping it against the benchmark. Titles in India are a big misnomer and hardly any survey on compensation ever probes and captures and calibrates the tangible outcome based bench marking! If we dive deep, we will find that the key factors of Education, Experience and Quality of Education, Quality and relevance of experience and education are not calculated granular! A diploma holder technical manager gets the salary benchmarked for the top T-school manager with top quality experience in a challenging and break-through

Well-known interviewing technique “laddering,” the Means-End Chain!

Courtesy HBR article...  The 30 Elements of Consumer Value: A Hierarchy (hbr.org) Understanding Consumer Decision-Making with Means-End Research - Rockbridge (rockresearch.com) Many of the studies involved the well-known interviewing technique “laddering,” which probes consumers’ initial stated preferences to identify what’s driving them In our research we don’t accept on its face a consumer’s statement that a certain product attribute is important; instead we explore what underlies that statement. For example, when someone says her bank is “convenient,” its value derives from some combination of the functional elements  saves time,   avoids hassle,   simplifies,  and  reduces effort.   We have identified 30 “elements of value”—fundamental attributes in their most essential and discrete forms.  These elements fall into four categories: functional, emotional, life changing, and social impact. Our model traces its conceptual roots to the psychologist Abraham Maslow’s “hierarchy of needs,