Skip to main content

It's just feedback-would you sleepover it?

Everything that is broken can be fixed! Let's be positive but hiding deep rooted issues for long under the carpet could erupt with volcanic intensity. Let's fix it with gratitude! Thank Glassdoor, thanks to those who took pain to write their reviews.
As part of the Glassdoor review by an employee who worked between 2012 and 2018 with this IT Services company, based at Nagpur India (Happens to be a company I worked for as an HR Manager, between April 2009 and Feb 2011) This feedback got ONE star rating and has Pros too as you see here (This company is better you if are joining at any of the managerial designations.). My idea is to draw your attention towards the value laden review that it is by a seemingly quite committed and successful employee who ultimately became victim of a poor culture . Despite his poor parting experiences this person wrote a feedback which is more valuable than a management consulting firm's recommendations! Read below in italics!: This review was written in Dec 2018 and has been found "helpful" by 12 readers (highest number for all 136 reviews so far). You must know that this Glassdoor page is owned by the employer as "engaged employer", however, it is different story that the last company update on this Glassdoor page is more than 2 years old. Interestingly (and not surprisingly), despite being an 'engaged' employer , by tag, none of the reviews were ever responded to by the company respondent! Now surprised, in fact shocked! :) Sorry, read on please: here comes the feedback of the millennium, honestly, at least the President (and co founders, etc) of this company would certainly find it as such! Also to let you know that overall rating given for company is 3.4. This is a 15 years old company that has ~1000 people on rolls globally. CEO's approval rating on Glassdoor is 90% and this is laudable.
I want you to read it and reflect upon and share feedback and comments as you can do! Many of you will find facts and situations quite familiar and would resonate strongly at times with your experiences of workplace culture, leadership, policies etc.
This is important to note that this noteworthy review came to Glassdoor after nearly 9 months of the E&Y consulting to the company that recommended many all new and some modified strategy in following areas: Defining new Band & Grade Structure and mapping associates to it  Defining Competency Frameworks  Re-defining Performance Management System and Process  Defining the Career Management Framework 
 Cons: This review is primarily focused towards high attrition rates faced by the company and company’s inability to retain (senior/mid-level/junior) good talent. Associates are rarely recognized, let alone thanked, for going above and beyond to accomplish something out of the ordinary. Once you've "done the impossible", it's just assumed that you can and will do it again and again from now on. Extremely poor appraisal policy, leading to high attrition rate. More than 15% employees resigned this year alone. 1. Management culture- Management doesn’t like to pass on the responsibilities/opportunities to the layer underneath and mostly sits on powers to take decisions that are mostly made without any/unexplainable rationale. Company is in dire need of technical managers compared to ‘PPT and Excel Sheet’ managers. 70-80 percent managers are home grown and lack basic skillset to do healthy management. More than expected perks to management and peanuts to even senior technical employees 2. Compensation Culture- Company has been in extreme cost cutting mode since an year (after spending 30 crore+ for interior design of the newly leased facility and buying few not so necessary software tools). Nagpur associates get a hike of 4-5% whereas US associates get a hike of 2-2.5%. Yearly raises doesn’t even beat inflation. Management draws extremely fat paychecks while technical staff is left with peanuts. Company is not open towards new ideas and technical staff’s opinion mostly doesn’t count. Company has aligned pay structure as per (low) industry standards, and hiring new talent as per (low) industry standards. Low quality and unfairly low compensation specially for employees working on non-mstr tools and technologies. 3. Pathetic exit policies- You keep on getting new assignments even when you put papers. HR folks ensure that full and final settlement will not be done if an associate on notice period tries to leave/live peacefully. 4. Lack of transparency- I joined in the year 2012 and at the time company’s core policies were very much reflective of the dynamic culture (open dialog, transparency and work-life balance). With new policies, employees turned hesitant, less enthusiastic and now fear raising voice against wrong policies. In this company everyone is just confined to their own group only. Even managers take lunch together all the time like kids and don’t feel important enough to interact with other employees. 5. Technical Grooming and Trainings- Company doesn’t find it important to train employees in few niche areas (such trainings are also restricted to management folks only). Untrained employees can never become milking cows. 6. Brag culture- Company brags itself as a data analytics firm (with some recommendation from Gartner), unfortunately you won’t find a single data scientist in entire firm. Delivering MSTR ETL solutions is not how you become top data analytics company <unquote>
Now, what's your thoughts guys!


Popular posts from this blog

What is The Hay Group Total Reward Framework

The Hay Group Total Reward Framework A new way of understanding reward Reward strategies must be anchored in business reality to be effective. Which means linking it to your business strategy – and the needs of your employees as well as your organisation. Our Total Reward Framework helps you optimise reward, no matter how challenging the conditions. The issue Remuneration tends to be one of the worst-managed parts of an organisation’s cost structure. But with 10-70 per cent of total costs wrapped up in it, reward cannot be ignored, particularly in a downturn. To be effective, reward programmes must reflect the needs of the business, now and in the future. Only if they are tied closely to company strategy, business performance and the needs of employees can reward programmes deliver the ROI that is needed in tough times[MK1] . The Hay Group Total Reward Framework takes strategy as a starting point – and it focuses on total reward: every financial measure together with no

Aon Hewitt Total Rewards Framework

Aon Hewitt Total Rewards Framework The Aon Hewitt model and approach believes in considering Total Rewards as a business tool and very much linked to overall business objectives! Reward as understood is a very complex mechanism and some efforts of correcting the base pay and titling in a hurry by many MNCs in India have done a bigger crime by trying to correct it by market adjustments without looking at the talent map, complexity and expectations out of role and mapping it against the benchmark. Titles in India are a big misnomer and hardly any survey on compensation ever probes and captures and calibrates the tangible outcome based bench marking! If we dive deep, we will find that the key factors of Education, Experience and Quality of Education, Quality and relevance of experience and education are not calculated granular! A diploma holder technical manager gets the salary benchmarked for the top T-school manager with top quality experience in a challenging and break-through

Well-known interviewing technique “laddering,” the Means-End Chain!

Courtesy HBR article...  The 30 Elements of Consumer Value: A Hierarchy ( Understanding Consumer Decision-Making with Means-End Research - Rockbridge ( Many of the studies involved the well-known interviewing technique “laddering,” which probes consumers’ initial stated preferences to identify what’s driving them In our research we don’t accept on its face a consumer’s statement that a certain product attribute is important; instead we explore what underlies that statement. For example, when someone says her bank is “convenient,” its value derives from some combination of the functional elements  saves time,   avoids hassle,   simplifies,  and  reduces effort.   We have identified 30 “elements of value”—fundamental attributes in their most essential and discrete forms.  These elements fall into four categories: functional, emotional, life changing, and social impact. Our model traces its conceptual roots to the psychologist Abraham Maslow’s “hierarchy of needs,