Skip to main content

What's "Job Worth" project! OD guys keep you on track!

 For an OD role, a friend of mine was recently asked in an interview with a CHRO of an engineering tech company, whether she had done any work around "job worth"! 

This incident triggered my follow up conversation with this friend.

What in HR, we all have heard is "Job Evaluation" , benchmarking and level descriptors , all that courtesy Hays, Mercer, Aon and other Total Rewards firms. 

Online search has very few content on "job worth". What mostly we see are from the C&B /Salary perspective. 

While job worth in terms of an OD expert is always an inside view of the job/role/person/value that role was created to deliver vs what that role (by design) evolves or dissolves into.

We hear terms like "sense of growth" that talented people crave for in a firm..

This is usually true when they see , they have "mastered" their role to the level of now losing interest and abilities to make it any better! This is "job-holder's" perspective. One of 4 quadrants or spectrum of the job! I love tern spectrum as I personally in my consulting projects on OD/Competencies models have found that 'level descriptors' are way below the "spectrum" definition of the job. To make it clear to you, level descriptors are same as you see in JDs of a role in any given function. Look at JDs of few levels below and few levels above and you see, the role definition if magnified in outlook (mostly administrative definition of the role, simply put hierarchical, food chain definition)

Now, what is "spectrum" in a job role?

Spectrum is the capability stretch in any role, where role is given singular attention in terms of creating "incremental" value to the role to make innovation and internal/external research, adding value to the "Capability Framework" of that function. This is CoE centered approach . Spectrum is capability and CoE centered approach where, people assume roles, when they fit the mission and vision of the "function".

Usually, when we talk of job worth, we talk about "person" and "pay". Impact (KPIs) .

Spectrum and Capabilities and CoEs based approach in reality shall be cascaded to roles, where much better way to keep filters of evaluation of the job through OKRs..

If you are thinking about "Job Worth" in general , then you can talk about various aspects of position (Relationships, management, Regulation, External factors (market), Demand and Supply, Cost of services this position offers, etc.)

While above factors help acknowledging REALITY due to market, an OD expect will always follow "CoE/Capability/Spectrum" model , judged through OKRs! 

Remember, OKRs are for function, while KPIs are for roles! 

What is your thought. Kindly share through comment section below. 

In my experience, great talent look for "Sense of Worth" more often than "Sense of Growth"! They know, growth is an outcome, most necessarily Stoics don't care much about..(Amor Fati!)

#MementoMori, #AmorFati


Popular posts from this blog

What is The Hay Group Total Reward Framework

The Hay Group Total Reward Framework A new way of understanding reward Reward strategies must be anchored in business reality to be effective. Which means linking it to your business strategy – and the needs of your employees as well as your organisation. Our Total Reward Framework helps you optimise reward, no matter how challenging the conditions. The issue Remuneration tends to be one of the worst-managed parts of an organisation’s cost structure. But with 10-70 per cent of total costs wrapped up in it, reward cannot be ignored, particularly in a downturn. To be effective, reward programmes must reflect the needs of the business, now and in the future. Only if they are tied closely to company strategy, business performance and the needs of employees can reward programmes deliver the ROI that is needed in tough times[MK1] . The Hay Group Total Reward Framework takes strategy as a starting point – and it focuses on total reward: every financial measure together with no

Aon Hewitt Total Rewards Framework

Aon Hewitt Total Rewards Framework The Aon Hewitt model and approach believes in considering Total Rewards as a business tool and very much linked to overall business objectives! Reward as understood is a very complex mechanism and some efforts of correcting the base pay and titling in a hurry by many MNCs in India have done a bigger crime by trying to correct it by market adjustments without looking at the talent map, complexity and expectations out of role and mapping it against the benchmark. Titles in India are a big misnomer and hardly any survey on compensation ever probes and captures and calibrates the tangible outcome based bench marking! If we dive deep, we will find that the key factors of Education, Experience and Quality of Education, Quality and relevance of experience and education are not calculated granular! A diploma holder technical manager gets the salary benchmarked for the top T-school manager with top quality experience in a challenging and break-through

Why is ‘Total Rewards’ key to talent management?

Why is ‘Total Rewards’ key to talent management?  Total Rewards (TR) is talent life-cycle management tool that holistically embeds into the whole business plan.  TR can add feather to the modern day HR if they can handle it well to give company the long term competitive edge Unfortunately TR is not a broad-brush tool and so it requires an insightful ‘HR Leader’ with strong sense and capability of strategic alignment, analytic thinking and rightful implementation strengths . WHY TOTAL REWARDS? You must show employees “what’s in it for me.” This means tying together the benefit of the job, the culture, their colleagues, and the company’s mission and its values, as well as total rewards. But total rewards are the most immediate and visible element to employees. SOURCE: Bremen, John and Sejen, Laura. Advancing Total Rewards & the Employee Value Proposition. WorldatWork. 2012. COMPENSATION: IT’S KIND OF A BIG DEAL Compensation can be the single biggest cost