Skip to main content

The Pyramid Game -Indian IT Services firms vs GCCs---How GCCs getting dominant over time...

With the IT recession exposing "employee farming" practices as adopted by service firms, "TCS continues its focus on leveraging internal talent through upskilling and cross-skilling for growth opportunities. In FY 2024, 33% of job requirements were fulfilled through grooming its internal talent," said Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) in its annual report for 2023-2024.



This is a commendable move by TCS, and I believe most large and midsized IT service firms would follow suit!
This move will restrict the in-market hiring frenzy for the future, when the market picks up (likely in mid-2025). And it goes without saying that we will see very few mass layoffs that we saw in the last post-COVID hiring led bloat!
This move would obviously worry staffing firms, who fed on the hiring frenzy!
https://lnkd.in/gvJbjitc
Indian IT Services firms have a very effective cost-to-profitability ratio on their service delivery cost pyramid, as HSBC Research Report cites (Check article: "GCCs driving 23% of India's IT exports" in TOI, 20th May 2024).
The same report confirms that GCCs have advantage of domain expertise, while Indian IT services firms edge them through their IT tech superiority!
Remember, we are not talking about IT OEMs or platform or enterprise application software firms here...in these cases, GCCs or their parents have natural advantages.
We all wonder, how, GCCs for same IT skills, pay between 30 and 50% higher base pay than the Indian IT services firms and the simple answer is their Pyramid that is OK with lower margins to cost, while Indian IT services firms have much higher margins. This justifies the saying, that Rewards (Compensation and benefits) is a matter of Capacity and Willingness to pay!
Ask anyone in Mercer, Willis Tower Watson, etc. and they will tell you, how as a strategy, the GCCs in India have a higher willingness to keep their Pay and benefits, not just more attractive but meaningful, over their Indian counterparts! Tarang Paradkar

Think why GCCs don't compete with anyone when it comes to Rewards?
Side note:
1. In my Yoga class, the don't category of guidelines says: Don't compete with others! :)
2. In Coffee With Karan show, Rani Mukherjee was asked: Where are you in the number game of Bollywood heroines?
She answered: I am a bitch, I don't run with rats!

It has been a decade or more and this statement of Rani has a very special fan following!

Disclaimer: I am not trying to denigrate what Indian IT Services companies do. Just that, 50% of their smart hires, who leave them early, join GCCs! Can't blame your model!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is The Hay Group Total Reward Framework

The Hay Group Total Reward Framework A new way of understanding reward Reward strategies must be anchored in business reality to be effective. Which means linking it to your business strategy – and the needs of your employees as well as your organisation. Our Total Reward Framework helps you optimise reward, no matter how challenging the conditions. The issue Remuneration tends to be one of the worst-managed parts of an organisation’s cost structure. But with 10-70 per cent of total costs wrapped up in it, reward cannot be ignored, particularly in a downturn. To be effective, reward programmes must reflect the needs of the business, now and in the future. Only if they are tied closely to company strategy, business performance and the needs of employees can reward programmes deliver the ROI that is needed in tough times[MK1] . The Hay Group Total Reward Framework takes strategy as a starting point – and it focuses on total reward: every financial measure together with no...

Aon Hewitt Total Rewards Framework

Aon Hewitt Total Rewards Framework The Aon Hewitt model and approach believes in considering Total Rewards as a business tool and very much linked to overall business objectives! Reward as understood is a very complex mechanism and some efforts of correcting the base pay and titling in a hurry by many MNCs in India have done a bigger crime by trying to correct it by market adjustments without looking at the talent map, complexity and expectations out of role and mapping it against the benchmark. Titles in India are a big misnomer and hardly any survey on compensation ever probes and captures and calibrates the tangible outcome based bench marking! If we dive deep, we will find that the key factors of Education, Experience and Quality of Education, Quality and relevance of experience and education are not calculated granular! A diploma holder technical manager gets the salary benchmarked for the top T-school manager with top quality experience in a challenging and break-through...

Why Organizations are so BAD at Talent Management? A curious case below..

Founded in 2019 in South San Francisco,   ProcDNA has grown 2x in 24 months....from 100 to 200 as of Feb 25th as you see the snapshot below. I was looking at their India staff data looking actively for jobs as evident on Naukri.com, a leading job portal in India. For past 30 days, 39 staff in India looking out actively. If you check for past 2 months, this number inflates to 49. Median tenure of staff here is 8 months.  What interests me are the following: 27 jobs posted on LinkedIn and 9 out of them are just repetitions. Same job posted many times (5x at times).  There is only 1 Director level job is up there as far as senior open roles are concerned. Many jobs have titles like Senior/Associate/Assistant Engagement Lead, etc.  Below are 4 senior staff in key roles who are active on Naukri.com , looking for next job.  What's wrong here? Nothing....they are just looking out...:) ....But that's a self fulfilling thought, right, especially when you are the co...