Skip to main content

Why HR chooses to remain a feel-good function, placating fancy practices or trends!

Thank you TV Rao sir for telling or reminding us that the CEO is actually a Super CHRO! Especially when, all things tech, investment and infrastructure are common, we finally compete on talent. This is what Larry Bossidy, then CEO of Honeywell said.

Recently (2014) Management Guru Ram Charan in his HBR article reproduced the idea of HR and the role of the CEO.
You may have read in this article 'Time to Split HR', (available online) that HR shall not be a department but a function! And the split shall be called HR Ops/Admin and HR Leadership Organization (HR-LO)! For HR-LO, he asked this function to report to the CEO and work under his leadership intent and strategy for this function, while HR-Admin shall report to the CFO!
We remember, Ram's view didn't go well with HR people and Josh Bersin had to write a rebuttal article in Forbes I guess to assuage hurt feelings of the HR folks... While Josh didn't agree with what Ram proposed, he agreed that HR needs a split or redesign!
If now, we agree, HR is a function as you also agree, this must be tagged to and built as part of the company's strategy that CEO (not CHRO) builds and presents to the board for approval!
In absence of above action by the CEO and also the board not giving this function that strategic importance, HR remains a feel-good function, placating fancy practices or trends! 


How many of us know that a CA who worked for 19 years of her initial career with BEL is today the Chief Happiness Officer of
Deloitte India...
Do we know what exclusive and strategic actions, this Partner level position might be doing, when she has a CHRO, a Chief Talent Officer and a very empathetic CEO around her, all for people?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is The Hay Group Total Reward Framework

The Hay Group Total Reward Framework A new way of understanding reward Reward strategies must be anchored in business reality to be effective. Which means linking it to your business strategy – and the needs of your employees as well as your organisation. Our Total Reward Framework helps you optimise reward, no matter how challenging the conditions. The issue Remuneration tends to be one of the worst-managed parts of an organisation’s cost structure. But with 10-70 per cent of total costs wrapped up in it, reward cannot be ignored, particularly in a downturn. To be effective, reward programmes must reflect the needs of the business, now and in the future. Only if they are tied closely to company strategy, business performance and the needs of employees can reward programmes deliver the ROI that is needed in tough times[MK1] . The Hay Group Total Reward Framework takes strategy as a starting point – and it focuses on total reward: every financial measure together with no...

Aon Hewitt Total Rewards Framework

Aon Hewitt Total Rewards Framework The Aon Hewitt model and approach believes in considering Total Rewards as a business tool and very much linked to overall business objectives! Reward as understood is a very complex mechanism and some efforts of correcting the base pay and titling in a hurry by many MNCs in India have done a bigger crime by trying to correct it by market adjustments without looking at the talent map, complexity and expectations out of role and mapping it against the benchmark. Titles in India are a big misnomer and hardly any survey on compensation ever probes and captures and calibrates the tangible outcome based bench marking! If we dive deep, we will find that the key factors of Education, Experience and Quality of Education, Quality and relevance of experience and education are not calculated granular! A diploma holder technical manager gets the salary benchmarked for the top T-school manager with top quality experience in a challenging and break-through...

Tech Recruiting in the AI Era: How LLMs Are Transforming Sourcing and Screening

Recruiting for technology roles has always been a high-stakes game. If sourcing and screening go well, recruiting wins; if not, it’s a black hole. These two functions are the backbone of hiring—everything else is communication. But in the age of Generative AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) , the rules have changed. The Old Way: Conventional Tech Recruiting For decades, recruiters relied on: Boolean searches on job boards and LinkedIn. ATS keyword matching for skills and experience. Hygiene checks like education, years of experience , and past employers. While these methods worked, they were rigid and often failed to capture the nuances of evolving tech roles. Recruiters were constantly playing catch-up with new stacks, frameworks, and delivery models. The Modern Way: AI-Powered Recruiting Enter LLMs and AI-driven platforms —game-changers for sourcing and screening. These tools don’t just match keywords; they understand context , generate structured outputs , and scale personalizati...