Skip to main content

Women's low participation in IT and Engineering -Is it a supply problem?-Why most people diagnose it the wrong way


If you follow Swaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar and his Swaminomics piece in TOI, you may have read this article, this Sunday: https://lnkd.in/gDuacDWihashtag

He talked about power of STEM grads in India, out of which 25% are engineers, who land up in these GCCs..
Society of Women Engineers, says, women occupy 29.2% of all engineering classes at enrolment levels for B.Tech in India.
So, this is supply side problem or choice that women have!
Despite that, at junior levels,Lowe's India GCC has 60% women representation and 28% at the VP levels!
Do we see a problem in Gender suppression (unconscious bias) at supply side?
Answer is No. But more insights come from the VP of HR at Lowe's Vidya Munirathnam, where she cites gap in skills levels and also the maternity leave and then missing the tech change bus and thereafter dropping the career advancement jet, all by choice to lead a family and raise kids, and maybe care giving to elderly parents/in-laws at home! 6
We agree this maternity leave (now 6 months and thanks for that to the GoI for mandating it) is causing some problem, though not established by facts as we haven't seen any authentic survey to substantiate this diminisher as an established fact culling career advancement for women!
For simple reason, talk to all women VPs and ask them, why & how, despite this maternity led career whimper, you got here?
I agree, you may miss a promotion for a year due to a kid etc., but to reach a VP level from the associate levels, you have 7 or 8 levels of promotion opportunities.
Also, ask why and how, we have 60% women at junior levels? It's natural and organic or artificially built due or certain policies and focus change on gender equity matter? Most likely, it is as programmed to favor women (Don't take it negatively). Even IITs had for 5 years (2018-2023) a lower cut-off mark for admissions of women! If you have no idea, go check it. Mind you even XLRI has a lower cut-off for women candidates...so no shame and no one is judging anything!
What worries me are a few facts:
1. Why blame a women's maternity leave for slowing down their career?
2. If tech shifts at work are happening at landslide levels and all the time, not just women on maternity for that whole or part of that BIG shift time, rather whole organization goes through a freeze-change-unfreeze (Aka Lewin's OD/Change management model)
3. Assuming, the 60% women share at junior levels are due to design, what design have we got in place to obfuscate this maternity imposed tardiness?

My final take is: HR needs its talent configuration which Laszlo Bock had suggested and had at Google, when he was the Head of People Ops: 30% HR traditional folks in HR, 30% Researchers and trend and practices readers , who are backed by degrees in Psychology, Socio/Anthropology, stats and analytics and rest as People development experts!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is The Hay Group Total Reward Framework

The Hay Group Total Reward Framework A new way of understanding reward Reward strategies must be anchored in business reality to be effective. Which means linking it to your business strategy – and the needs of your employees as well as your organisation. Our Total Reward Framework helps you optimise reward, no matter how challenging the conditions. The issue Remuneration tends to be one of the worst-managed parts of an organisation’s cost structure. But with 10-70 per cent of total costs wrapped up in it, reward cannot be ignored, particularly in a downturn. To be effective, reward programmes must reflect the needs of the business, now and in the future. Only if they are tied closely to company strategy, business performance and the needs of employees can reward programmes deliver the ROI that is needed in tough times[MK1] . The Hay Group Total Reward Framework takes strategy as a starting point – and it focuses on total reward: every financial measure together with no...

Aon Hewitt Total Rewards Framework

Aon Hewitt Total Rewards Framework The Aon Hewitt model and approach believes in considering Total Rewards as a business tool and very much linked to overall business objectives! Reward as understood is a very complex mechanism and some efforts of correcting the base pay and titling in a hurry by many MNCs in India have done a bigger crime by trying to correct it by market adjustments without looking at the talent map, complexity and expectations out of role and mapping it against the benchmark. Titles in India are a big misnomer and hardly any survey on compensation ever probes and captures and calibrates the tangible outcome based bench marking! If we dive deep, we will find that the key factors of Education, Experience and Quality of Education, Quality and relevance of experience and education are not calculated granular! A diploma holder technical manager gets the salary benchmarked for the top T-school manager with top quality experience in a challenging and break-through...

CORPORATE CULTURE AND FIVE STAGES OF ASSIMILATION

If the study of culture has a predominant guru, it would be Edgar H Schein , Professor Emeritus at MIT. Schein, who has studied the elements of culture for over half a century has a simple there-layer model for understanding corporate culture (Schein, 2009). The three levels are: ü   1.  Artifacts. These are made up of visible structures, processes and behavior. Easy to observe, artifacts are the outermost layer. ü   2.  Espoused values. These are the strategies and philosophies at play. They include what people focus on and ‘how things get done around here’. ü   3.  Underlying assumptions. These are the unconscious beliefs and perceptions rooted in the history of the business. This innermost layer is built through collective experiences including past successes and failures. Corporate culture is as powerful as it is multifaceted. The best way to understand it is to experience it first-hand. Be immersed in both the explicit behavior and implici...